SPQR Research

The model can propose. It cannot create authority.

Our research asks what must be true before autonomous systems can act under policy, produce defensible evidence and improve without escaping governance.

Runtime governanceVerifiable policyConstitutional authorityGoverned improvement

SPQR / RESEARCH OPERATING SYSTEMPUBLIC
S
PROOFSNOT PROMISES
01AuthorityWho is permitted to decide?
02Policy stateWhich reviewed rule is active?
03Action boundaryCan control intervene before effect?
04EvidenceWhat proves the chain held?
PAPERS → ARCHITECTURE → PRODUCTS → PROOFCHALLENGE WELCOME

The research position

We publish the architecture because “trust us” is not a governance model.

Authority, evidence and execution conditions should be separable from the model generating the proposal, then inspectable by people who did not build the system.

Model proposes · authority verifies · runtime enforces · evidence remains

Four research lines. One operational question.

What has to be true before an autonomous system is allowed to cause an effect?

The corpus moves from jurisprudential questions to concrete system boundaries. Each line asks a different part of the same governance problem.

01
Question

Where does authority live?

Research lineConstitutional AI & verifiable trust

Legitimacy, public authority, non-unilateral amendment and constraints that bind machine action.

FOUNDATION
02
Question

How does policy become executable?

Research lineCryptographic policy enforcement

Signed policy state, provenance, active authority and deterministic governance artefacts.

PRAXIS
03
Question

Can governance intervene before effect?

Research lineRuntime action-boundary control

Trusted provenance, mapped operations, fail-closed execution and per-action verdicts.

AEGIS
04
Question

How can systems improve without self-authorising?

Research lineGoverned candidate improvement

Auditable proposals, challenge evidence, containment and held-out evaluation rather than invisible self-modification.

NEXT

Bounded claims

A controlled result is evidence about the controlled result. Nothing more.

Serious governance research should expose its boundaries rather than smuggling confidence through tone.

NOT A CLAIM OFUniversal AI safety
NOT A CLAIM OFAutomatic legal compliance
NOT A CLAIM OFInfallible classification
THE CLAIM ISThe stated process, authority and evidence can be inspected.

Public research library

Read the corpus. Follow the argument.

Preprints, working papers and whitepapers are labelled by their public source. Use the filters to move through the research lines.

Search Google Scholar

9 public works shown

01
2026Preprint · arXiv

Runtime Governance for Agentic AI: Action-Boundary Control with Trusted Provenance and Fail-Closed Execution

A trusted runtime seam between agent proposals and tool effects.

Read ↗
02
2026Working paper · SSRN

Proofs, Not Promises: Governed Candidate Improvement for Agent Control Runtimes

An auditable candidate lifecycle instead of invisible self-modification.

Read ↗
03
2026Preprint · arXiv

Cryptographic Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Systems: The Aegis Architecture for Verifiable Policy Enforcement

Signed policy state and auditable governance artefacts at the execution boundary.

Read ↗
04
2025Whitepaper · SSRN

SPQR Whitepaper: A Constitutional Framework for Sovereign AI Governance

The broader constitutional-governance thesis and supporting SPQR architecture.

Read ↗
05
2025Working paper · SSRN

Lex Aegis: The Living Law — A Public Blueprint for Constitutional AI Governance

Public participation, action in the absence of authority and plural governance.

Read ↗
06
2025Working paper · SSRN

Lex Fiducia: Constitutional AI and the Architecture of Verifiable Trust

Verifiable policy state and non-unilateral amendment as a basis for trust.

Read ↗
07
2025Working paper · SSRN

Lex Digitalis — The System Finds Itself in Contempt: Immutable Ethics for Autonomous AI

Cryptographically enforced machine constraints as operational legal instruments.

Read ↗
08
2025Working paper · SSRN

Lex Incipit: A Constitutional Doctrine for Immutable Ethics in Autonomous AI

Binding, verifiable constraints established at system genesis.

Read ↗
09
2025Working paper · SSRN

Lex Aeterna Machina: Autonomous Ethical Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Non-discretionary responsibilities before broader operational freedom.

Read ↗

Research should invite challenge

Read it. Challenge it. Then inspect the implementation.

If you are working on AI governance, assurance, runtime control or regulated agent deployment, bring the hard questions.

Public papers · inspectable architecture · bounded claims